Oil and gas well site reclamation, polluter pays and pie crust promises


https://thenarwhal.ca/the-story-of-albertas-100-billion-well-liability-problem-how-did-we-get-here/

Oil and gas well site reclamation, polluter pays and pie crust promises

Oil and gas well site reclamation, polluter pays and pie crust promises

 

As was reported last week, a large chunk of change is being sought by the Petroleum Services Association of Canada from the federal government to bolster economic activity around reclamation of well sites in Alberta and Saskatchewan.  This, as I have noted in the past, is not in line with the polluter pays principle and, while attractive in this economic  downturn, reflects a fundamental problem with how we manage the large number of unreclaimed well sites in Alberta.  Throwing public money at the problem (either directly or through tax breaks) is a convenient approach but it is also likely to allow a broken system to be perpetuated.

A core aspect of an effectively applied polluter pay principle is that the price signals attract investor and managerial attention and in turn drive due diligence in how we pursue our environmental management on a site by site basis and how we decide whether an acquisition of other property (or well) should proceed.  Throwing public money at the problem undermines this site specific drive to do better.

In the meantime we, as a society continue under rules that appear to be, as Mary Poppins (both my daughters love her) would call it, “pie crust promises; easy to make, easy to break”.  We are assured that polluters will pay for the pollution they release into the environment and yet all too often the promise appears all too easy to break:  insufficient financial security up front, insolvency laws which favour other creditors over environmental cleanup orders, and a lack of regulatory timelines on reclamation (which I would argue could also drive due diligence and minimize risks to the public purse) all reflect a system that needs fewer promises and more concrete action.

Frankly, with the “ask” of $500 million I was reminded again of Mary Poppins as I may have looked like the character of Michael Banks [below].

MBanks

“Close your mouth, please [Jason]. We are not a codfish.” Mary Poppins

Not because the money is a large sum (I suspect the nature of the problem demands more), not because I don’t believe the money would support jobs and the economy; but because we need to tackle this issue with regulations — the market approach has clearly failed, and undoubtedly will continue to do so.   We need to address it soon or we are likely to find ourselves just hiring another nanny to solve our problems. (Even Mary Poppins’ magic isn’t sufficient to clean up Alberta’s unreclaimed sites).

 

 


ABOUT THE ENVIRONMENTAL LAW CENTRE:

The Environmental Law Centre (ELC) has been seeking strong and effective environmental laws since it was founded in 1982. The ELC is dedicated to providing credible, comprehensive and objective legal information regarding natural resources, energy and environmental law, policy and regulation in Alberta. The ELC’s mission is to educate and champion for strong laws and rights so all Albertans can enjoy clean water, clean air and a healthy environment. Our vision is a society where laws secure an environment that sustains current and future generations.

As a charity, the Environmental Law Centre depends on your financial support. Help us to continue to educate and champion for strong environmental laws, through tools such as our blog and all of our other resources, so that all Albertans can enjoy a healthy environment. Your support makes a difference.
Donate online today


 

Share this:
Facebooktwittermail
No Comments

Post A Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.