Province acknowledges destructive recreation: upped enforcement or flavor of the month?

17 May Province acknowledges destructive recreation: upped enforcement or flavor of the month?

Province acknowledges destructive recreation: upped enforcement or flavor of the month?

 

“There’s no God-given right to mud-boggers”

(Minister of Justice and Solicitor General, Nanton News, May 13, 2013)

May long weekend is here:  begin the bush parties, litter, trucks in the river. . .  I wish I could find last year’s Sustainable Resource Development blog post about the perennial rotting couches. There will be liquor bans, fire bans, trail closures and check stops. Responsible recreationalists will understand.

Next time you head out, stop by the MD Ranchland Hall at Chain Lakes and check out “The New War Zone”, a classic  newspaper feature about the efforts of rural municipalities to address destructive recreation.

The war’s not over. In 2012 near every municipality on the Eastern Slopes met collectively with three ministers–  Justice and Solicitor General, Alberta Environment and Sustainable Resources Development, and Tourism Parks and Recreation – to request action on public use of public land.

Enforcement is always a feature in recommendations to reform motorized recreation policy.  Examples include:

• The Recreational Stakeholder Workshop (2005) convened by OHV user groups and environmental groups;
• Watershed Protection on Public Lands, Agricultural Service Board Resolution #12, 2003);
• The Voluntary Planning Off Highway Vehicle Task Force Report for Nova Scotia (Eastern Provinces may be ahead. They’ve had public land for longer);
•  Review of Access Management Strategies and Tools, Foothills Landscape Managers Forum, (2009) .

This isn’t just about OHV use.  Unruly “random camping” has come up in question period, and the response asks us to expect more boots on the ground this summer. Thus, when the Solicitor General traveled to Chain Lakes for an announcement on May 13^th, the real question was whether this was just the annual summer kick-off spiel or something more?  We will see a new enforcement strategy for the Eastern Slopes, or is this simply seasonal issue awareness?

Try to look past the debate over access to public land under the pending South Saskatchewan Regional Plan (for the polarized version listen to Recreation or Conservation on CBC Radio “the 180” with Jim Brown).  In reality multiple ministries are trying to deal with the impacts of destructive recreation.

In 2011, the Public Lands Administration Regulation (PLAR) created new tools to address public use of vacant land.  PLAR showed excellent efforts by Sustainable Resource Development to fit the issue under a outdated Public Lands Act that barely considers recreational use. There has been little implementation, perhaps due partly to the next change.

In 2012, officers responsible for Fish and Wildlife, Commercial Vehicle Enforcement and Parks Conservation were consolidated under the Solicitor General. This makes sense if one considers that all ‘peace officers’ have a similar enforcement functions. The ministry’s goal of consolidating enforcement services to “ensure effective specialized enforcement” could be helpful. Creating a specialized OHV enforcement force was a top recommendation from the Nova Scotia report (above).

The officer transfer creates new challenges.  All ‘peace officers’ have powers to enforce regulatory offenses but not all officers have all powers under every statute. Then there are other policing priorities.  If your job was to promote a safe Alberta, where would you put law enforcement resources?  Perhaps on Highway 63 to Fort Mac?  One can see why backroad rowdies don’t top the list.

The Information Bulletin really doesn’t promise more than the annual weekend blitz.  It does, however, give much attention to the health of public land. And it isn’t alone. The Solicitor General is blogging about the outdoors. The  Nanton News quotes our political head of public security speaking the language more commonly used by land managers-  asking users to “respect the land”, to not abuse public resources and to leave it for the future. He acknowledges resistance to a “police state” but suggests that legislation dealing with OHV issues will be reviewed.

Now note the quotes from municipal councilors on further solutions: like a real trail system.  Moving recreation up the land use planning agenda could make enforcement a whole lot easier.

Enjoy the long weekend.

ABOUT THE ENVIRONMENTAL LAW CENTRE:

The Environmental Law Centre (ELC) has been seeking strong and effective environmental laws since it was founded in 1982. The ELC is dedicated to providing credible, comprehensive and objective legal information regarding natural resources, energy and environmental law, policy and regulation in Alberta. The ELC’s mission is to educate and champion for strong laws and rights so all Albertans can enjoy clean water, clean air and a healthy environment. Our vision is a society where laws secure an environment that sustains current and future generations.

As a charity, the Environmental Law Centre depends on your financial support. Help us to continue to educate and champion for strong environmental laws, through tools such as our blog and all of our other resources, so that all Albertans can enjoy a healthy environment. Your support makes a difference.
Donate online today